Ranchers Offer to End Monument Grazing: they want government to buy out their leases
By Paul Fattig, Medford Mail Tribune
Aug 10, 2004

A group of ranchers holding grazing leases in or near the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is asking Congress for a buyout to end their commercial livestock grazing in the area.

In an Aug. 4 letter to Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., a dozen ranchers seek assistance in obtaining "fair and equitable compensation" in exchange for their historic grazing leases, some of which have been held by ranch families for generations.

"We feel that retirement of our grazing leases will be a win-win situation for taxpayers, local government, environmental concerns, rural interface residents and livestock operators without major adverse impacts to the national and local economy, society and the open space concept," they wrote.

The letter is signed by ranchers Bob Miller of Hornbrook and Mike Dauenhauer of Ashland, representing the other ranchers.

To come up with an agreeable solution, Miller and Dauenhauer have been working with environmental activists Andy Kerr and Dave Willis, both of whom have opposed continued grazing on the public land. Kerr is the director of the National Public Lands Grazing Campaign; Willis the chairman of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council.

"We all recognize that none of our goals can be achieved by continuing to throw rocks at each other," explained Miller, 64, in an interview Monday, referring to what many have perceived would be an adversarial relationship.

"We also want to reduce this conflict in society," he added. "This conflict has been a big drain on taxpayers as well as on county, state and federal government."

No agreement has been reached on a buyout price.

"We plan to hire an appraiser and appraise it from the standpoint of replacement value," Miller said. "That's what the ranchers will need in order to continue in business."

The ranchers' request, which calls for permanently ending commercial livestock grazing in the affected grazing allotments, is supported by the Jackson County Stockmen's Association and the Oregon Cattlemen's Association.

That support is contingent on it being unique to the monument and not applicable to other federal lands where grazing is allowed, according to the letter.

The letter also asks that environmental interests pay a portion of buyout costs.

The ranchers aren_t eager to ride away from the annual high mountain grazing on federal land, said Miller, whose family has been ranching in the area for more than century.

"We're kind of like the Indians were 200 years ago," Miller said. "Somebody came in and decided they wanted to do something different with the land. We see this as being forced upon us."

He was referring to streamside restrictions contained in the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan as well as the creation of the monument in 2000."The basic problem is, the government, with the encouragement from the environmental community, has changed the rules and regulations utilizing these lands," he said, noting those changes appear to have society's support.

"What we want is to get a replacement value so the operations that care to can remain whole and remain a viable business operation," he said, noting he may choose to retire.

Ranchers who give up their grazing leases but want to continue ranching businesses would have to purchase property to offset the use of the federal lands, he said.

"We have to be able to replace the forage we are relinquishing with other forage," Miller said. "We would have to purchase other land to support the livestock for that period of time they would be on federal property."

Miller and his wife, Patricia, along with Kerr and Willis, went to Washington, D.C., in March to discuss the potential buyout with members of the Oregon delegation. U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, R-Hood River, have expressed interest in the effort, Miller said.

"But Senator Smith's support is necessary because Senator Wyden needs Smith's support to carry this through the Senate," Miller said. "We need all three in support if we're going to get this through Congress."

A call to Smith's Portland office Monday was referred to his D.C. office, where no one was available.

Kerr, like Miller, believes there is potential for an amicable resolution.

"The government has changed the rules on these guys," he said, adding the changes have made livestock grazing "increasingly problematic" on the monument land.

"Because these government policies are saying this land is more important than for livestock grazing, I think it_s fair the government compensates them for these permits," he said.

Other legislation has resulted in buyouts of grazing leases, he said.

"This shows there is a way to equitably resolve the conflicts between livestock grazing and protecting nature," he said.

Willis agreed.

"Paying private monument-area ranchers public money to take their private cows off these special public lands permanently is a win-win-win deal," he said. "It's the best possible ecological, political and economic outcome for the land, the taxpayers who subsidize public mismanagement of these private cattle year after year ... the ranchers themselves.

- Monument status heightened grazing concerns -

Created in June 2000, the 52,940-acre Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is in the U.S. Bureau of Land Management's Medford District.

The monument is at the juncture of the Cascade, Siskiyou and Klamath mountain ranges. Soda Mountain is its centerpiece.

The monument was established to protect the unique flora and fauna in the region, which scientists say is a rich biological crossroads, according to the monument proclamation.

The proclamation also said that if grazing practices were found incompatible with the monument_s mission, the BLM would have to consider modifying grazing leases to achieve compatibility or retire grazing allotments.

The area within the monument has been used as open range by ranchers for more than a century. Eleven ranchers currently hold grazing leases within the monument for 2,714 animal unit months, or AUMs. An AUM is the amount of forage needed to support one cow or a one cow/calf pair for a month.

The proposed buyout includes a dozen ranchers with leases on nearly 5,000 AUMS because some of the leases are for lands adjacent to the monument.

The current leases will expire in the spring of 2006, according to Howard Hunter, assistant monument manager. The grazing study also is scheduled to be concluded that year, he said.

The BLM has been given authority by Congress to renew the leases on an annual basis, he said.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and as defined under the provisions of "fair use", any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment for non-profit research and for educational use by our membership.

Monument Ranchers Seek Buyout
By Michelle Cole, Oregonian
Aug 23, 2004

ASHLAND -- On a hot August afternoon Mike Dauenhauer found his stray cattle exactly where he knew they'd be: beside the cool waters of a lake nestled in the brown and green hills outside Ashland.

He let out a high-pitched whistle, nudged his horse, Quincy, into a dusty gallop and herded the cows and their calves back to higher lands. Cattle have roamed this fence-free range for more than a century, and Dauenhauer, 43, has chased them since he was a boy.

The same places that draw cattle on summer afternoons are also havens for creatures found nowhere else -- the Keene Creek pebblesnail, the Jenny Creek redband trout and other species and subspecies so newly discovered that they have not yet been named. In fact, this Southern Oregon landscape where Dauenhauer and about a dozen other ranchers run their cattle in the summer is so ecologically unique that President Clinton on June 9, 2000, proclaimed it the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument.

Immediately, mining and timber cutting inside the monument were prohibited. Grazing continued, but the president ordered a study of whether livestock, which can be hard on the land, threaten the ecology of the area.

The study won't be completed for a few more years. Ultimately, the answer will determine whether cattle -- and cowboys -- will remain in these parts. But Dauenhauer and the other ranchers don't want to wait around for the results: They want out of their leases, and they want to dictate the terms.

They're asking the federal government to buy back the leases allowing them to graze cattle within the monument. And they want conservationists, who lobbied so hard and so successfully for the monument's creation, to share some of the buyback costs.

Under the terms of their current leases, the ranchers pay $1.43 per month for a cow and her calf to graze within the monument. Nobody is saying yet exactly how much the ranchers want for their leases -- at this point the numbers mentioned range from $1.5 million to $4 million total.

In the end, the ranchers argue, it would cost taxpayers far less for the government to buy out the leases than for a multiyear grazing study and the legal battles that are likely to follow.

"It kills me to think I'd be part of a deal that would restrict grazing up here forever," Dauenhauer says. But he feels he has little choice. Without a buyout, his operation could lose critical summer forage with no compensation.

"Grazing on the monument will end up here at some time, in my opinion," Dauenhauer says.

Whether a buyout happens, he says, "has a heck of a lot to do with what I'm going to do with my future."

The Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument is the nation's first monument designated in recognition of its biological diversity. The Bureau of Land Management credits the area's "remarkable ecology" to its location at the crossroads of the Cascade and Siskiyou mountain ranges. It extols the 111 species of butterflies found here, including the rare mardon skipper. But the BLM does little more than offer a color brochure to draw tourists to the area.

"It's not a monument we're promoting to visitors as a destination in itself. It's a special biological area," says Howard Hunter, assistant monument manager.

Besides, much of Hunter's time these days is consumed with the grazing study. The BLM has spent just under $1 million to date, he says. Land managers have fenced off 13 1/4-acre test plots within the monument. A team of outside scientists has reviewed the BLM's study design.

The results of the study will not be available until 2006. Even then, Hunter says, it will likely be years before the government issues a final decision.

The World Wildlife Fund also has hired scientists to measure the effects of grazing on plants and wildlife in the area.

For rancher Bob Miller, 64, both studies are swords hanging over his head. In his mind, they threaten the final blow to his operation.

Miller, who grazes cattle on the south side of the monument, near the California border, pumps an angry fist in the air when he talks about people who claim the low rates ranchers pay to graze on public lands amount to "welfare ranching."

He argues that the government promised ranchers long ago: "If you come out and put your blood, sweat and tears into the lands, we'll give you the rights to graze." But now Miller says stream and other wetland protections prescribed by the Northwest Forest Plan and additional restrictions tied to the monument designation make it difficult for ranchers to earn a living. Over the years, ranchers have voluntarily decreased the number of cattle they graze on the monument to satisfy environmental restrictions, he says. Today, the BLM estimates that there are 605 cattle roaming about 51,000 acres of public land.

Aside from environmental regulations, Miller says, ranchers who run cattle in the area face "a mind-set" that's difficult to fight.

"There are people who have bought the program that says, 'Cows are bad for the environment.' And they don't want them under any circumstances on public lands," he says.

Four generations of Miller's family have run cattle on the oak savanna and in the old-growth conifer forests. Cattle used to roam through this area and they didn't bother anybody, he says.

Lately, however, complaints have increased along with the number of homes and vacation cabins being built on private parcels sprinkled throughout the monument.

"People who live up here don't want cows eating their petunias," says Joe Dauenhauer, Mike's father. "But they don't like fences either."

At age 90, Joe Dauenhauer says he remembers when cattle were the "kings and queens" up here.

"Now you can't drive cattle on the highways anymore," he says. "People get impatient."

Conservationists raised the idea of a buyout of grazing leases within the Cascade-Siskiyou monument years ago. But ranchers were both distrustful of and insulted by what they considered to be low-ball offers.

This spring, the ranchers started talking again to Dave Willis, executive director of the Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, and to Andy Kerr, once the most-despised forest activist in Oregon who now represents a coalition of environmental groups promoting a voluntary national buyout of grazing permits on public lands.

The longtime adversaries have discovered at least one mutual goal. Conservationists want cattle out of the ecologically sensitive monument. And the ranchers are ready to leave.

Both sides agree that the ranchers should receive compensation so they can lease or purchase other summer pasture.

"Making these guys whole is socially just," Kerr says.

The ranchers and conservationists have not yet agreed on whether the conservationists should cover some of the cost of the buyout.

"We have to go further down the road," Kerr says.

In March, Miller, Kerr and Willis pitched their buyout proposal to Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore.. Earlier this month, the ranchers and conservationists collaborated on a letter to Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore.

Last week, spokesmen for Smith and Wyden said the senators were willing to consider the proposal and help find a solution.

The Oregon Cattlemen's Association has given its qualified support, even though the industry nationwide is nervous about the message it sends at a time when some environmental groups are campaigning to kick cattle off all federal lands.

"Many of our members just absolutely don't go along with this," says Coy Cowart, Oregon Cattlemen's president.

But Cowart says Oregon ranchers also understand that "everybody gets backed into a corner" and then "the thing that's uppermost in your mind is survival."

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and as defined under the provisions of "fair use", any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment for non-profit research and for educational use by our membership.