Board OKs Scott River TMDL Despite
By Tam Moore, Capital Press
December 23, 2005
YREKA, Calif. – A controversial pollution control
plan for the Scott River watershed in far Northern California was adopted early this month over the
objections of just about every witness who testified at the North Coast Pollution Control Board’s final
hearing. It’s the first of a suite of Klamath Basin total maximum daily load allocations to become
Environmentalist Felice Pace called the implementation portion of the plan “illegal.”
Sari Sommarstorm, a consultant on sediment, described the 700-page backup report as full of “fundamental
Vivian Helliwell of the Institute for Fisheries Management said the plan did nothing for
providing water flows needed to sustain fish.
About the only person who declared the Scott River
TMDL sufficient was Alexis Strauss, a regional representative of the U.S. Environmental Protection
“The staff report presents a well-reasoned analysis. ... It is consistent with other TMDLs
in the Western United States,” she said.
Stripped of all the extra words, the TMDL calls for
landowners to grow more shade trees along streams and to take a variety of actions to cut annual sediment
discharge to no more than 550 tons per square mile in the 814-square-mile basin. A 40-year target is set
for achieving the goals.
The Scott is a significant tributary of the Klamath River, located west of
Yreka and oriented generally north and south. Much of its water comes from snowpack in the Marble
The North Coast board is under a court-ordered deadline to get its Klamath sub-basin
plans wrapped up within two years.
“We have a whole bunch to go,” said Beverly Wasson, the Rio Nido
farmer who represents irrigated agriculture on the board and serves as its current chairwoman. In fact,
when many of the witnesses urged delay to fix disputed facts in the Scott plan, Wasson and other directors
learned from their staff that slipping adoption of one plan might push the whole process off schedule.
In an interview, Wasson said the problem is made worse by staff reductions that limit contact with
stakeholders in a watershed. Two years of talk went into the Scott TMDL, compared with three years’ work
drafting the first North Coast TMDL at the Garcia River in Mendocino County.
At least one board
member, Dennis Leonardi of Ferndale, voted for adoption of the Scott plan and in a following discussion
declared it destined to failure.
“Some goals can never be met, even if you stopped irrigation and
grew trees (along the streams) to their maximum height,” he said.
In forest areas, the TMDL leaves
tree height computation to California Forest Practice Rule standards, but it declares the 2005 standards
will stay in place if the state Board of Forestry modifies its riparian rules.
Tom Nelson of Redding, a
Sierra Pacific Industries forester and former member of the Board of Forestry, said the riparian rules are
due for a change because significant data is piling up questioning existing standards.
the sediment standards, the board set a 90-day deadline for a report back from Siskiyou County government
and the two major federal land management agencies.
Supervisor Peg Boland of Klamath National Forest
warned that her agency is dependent on congressional appropriations and can’t promise any schedule for
lowering erosion potential on forest lands.
Siskiyou County Supervisor Marsha Armstrong said without extra
government grants there’s no money for additional road maintenance, and study of relationships between
ground water and river flow are dependent on well owners volunteering sites for data collection.
of that doesn’t sit well with Mike Belchik, a fisheries biologist for the downriver Yurok Tribe and one of
many at the hearing who asked for help in restoring the Klamath’s fish runs.
“Those who suffer tend
to be those who use the fish,” he said. “What we want is a clear path to compliance.”
chief of the board’s Watershed Management Division, said rules are a long way off and stakeholders should
expect changes in management strategy as more data are collected and analyzed.
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and as defined under the provisions of "fair use", any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment for non-profit research and for educational use
by our membership.